| A funky supermotard evolution of the F650ST, which
itself was a street development of the F650. Now on 17 inch alloys
front and rear (old was 18F/17R spoked), which allows it to be shod
with wider and stickier sportsbike rubber. The engine is a BMW development
of the old 650 Rotax unit and the new cylinder head has lost one exhaust
port and a spark plug, and gained fuel injection. Double overhead
cams and four valves are retained and the compression ratio is up
to 11.5:1 from 9.7:1. The result is a couple more peak horsepower
at 6,500rpm and a little more torque some 300 rpm up the rev range
at 5,500 rpm.
The
biggest visual changes are the toothed belt drive to the rear-wheel,
which is now supported on a single-sided swingarm, the projector
headlights on a more aggressive looking front fairing and the “multi-purpose”
compartment on top of where the tank normally is. The slightly smaller
fuel tank is now under the rider’s seat, and in fact takes
up virtually every last cc of the underseat area. The bottom of
it even forms the rear wheel undertray. But as the claimed fuel
consumption is down by 25%, the range on a full tank should be about
the same. Under all the plastic there’s a twin-beam steel
top frame replacing the old spine one, but the oil for the dry-sumped
engine is still stored in the frame tubes up by the headstock. This
means a short life for the head races, which run dry when the heat
from the oil melts the grease in the bearings.
Front suspension is non-adjustable
as before, but the CS has lost the rear ride height adjuster of
the ST, which was very useful when the bike was used two-up or carrying
a load. In line with its greater “street orientation”,
suspension travel is reduced, as is the ground clearance, so getting
the pegs down should be a lot easier. Wheelbase is up by 25mm to
1,493mm, trail is down by 14mm and the bike has shed a couple of
kilos from it’s already light weight predecessor, probably
by getting rid of the centre stand.
However, it would be a mistake
to think of this as a development of the 650ST; it is in fact an
all-new bike which just happens to be powered by a single cylinder
4-stroke motor with the same bore and stroke as the ST. BMW’s
Marketing department have also come up with a new name for the bike,
and called it “The Scarver”. Riding the CS is described
as “Scarving”, whatever that is, although it will probably
appeal to the active youth market that the bike is aimed at. There’s
a whole range of goodies available for the bike, from soft luggage
and sound systems to bolt on carbon fibre and stainless steel bits,
as well as a whole line of clothing for on and off bike use. And
if that’s not enough you can also do a “mix & match”
type exercise of different coloured components to select the look
of the bike that you buy.
Sitting
on the bike for the first time, you’re immediately struck
by how low the bike feels, and although the seat height is only
down 5mm on the ST’s 785mm, it feels much more than this.
Ahead of you there’s this strange tray where the tank filler
normally sits, and it looks as though it could hold a substantial
lake if the bike is left out in the rain, as there’s no drain
holes in it. If not dried out first, this will immediately transfer
itself to the rider’s crotch as the clutch is let out, so
all prospective owners would be advised to carry a sponge with them
at all times! Nice wide bars have all the usual switches in all
the usual places (thankfully BM have refrained from fitting their
“unique” indicator switches), and there’s even
a three-position switch for the heated grips which were an option
fitted to this bike. Strangely, there’s no light switch, as
these now come on automatically with the ignition, in line with
new legislation that comes into effect for all vehicles later this
year. The analogue speedo and rev counter are grouped around the
usual ‘idiot lights’, including one for low fuel and
one for the ABS option that was fitted to the test bike. There’s
also an LCD clock and an LCD odometer, which can be switched between
total miles and a trip function.
Switch on the ignition and press
the starter, and after a couple of seemingly lethargic rumbles,
the big single fires up. As it’s fuel-injected, there’s
no choke and the bike will pull away smoothly from cold. On the
move, the lowered centre of gravity from the re-positioned fuel
tank makes itself felt with good low speed stability and easy direction
changes. In fact this is a very easy bike to ride, and surprisingly
for a single, there is very little vibration through the pegs or
bars at any engine speed, in spite of the fact that the old rubber
bar-mounts of the ST have been replaced with solid ones. The five-speed
gearbox is positive, if somewhat agricultural compared to a Japanese
one, and there were no false neutrals on the test bike. From rest,
first gear selects with a solid clunk, and as it high geared it’s
best to short-shift to second as soon as possible. The remaining
ratios are reasonably spaced and the engine can be revved-out to
get the maximum acceleration. In fact the engine pulls strongly
right through to the 7,500 rpm limiter in all gears, whereas its
Rotax predecessor got all breathless around 6,500 rpm.
The fuel injection is good, with
only a slight tendency to “hunt” on small throttle openings.
Slightly more disconcerting, until I got used to it anyway, was
a rather strange ‘two-stage ramp-effect’ when the throttle
was opened. By this I mean that the first movement of the throttle
produced a very gentle increase in engine speed and then, as if
a switch had been closed, the engine got onto the power hard as
you continued to open the throttle. This happened in all gears and
irrespective of the engine speed. It was as if the engine management
was checking to see if you really wanted to accelerate that hard,
and then when it found the throttle was still being opened, said
“OK – Lets Go!” The old carburetted engine had
a much sharper throttle response, but felt much less refined especially
around 4,000 revs, and also suffered from driveline snatch at low
revs, something completely absent from the CS and probably due to
a combination of the fuel injection and the belt drive.
The suspension is fairly soft
front and rear although well damped, and the ride is excellent with
the front end only getting a little vague at highly illegal speeds.
The bike sometimes got a little out of shape if you were pushing
it hard through long sweepers and encountered some unexpected bumps
and ripples. This happened a couple of times at around 90-95 with
the throttle pinned to the stop, and the bike shimmied gently as
the suspension fought to keep up with the inputs it was receiving.
But it was nothing alarming and the whole thing stayed on line through
the corner, helped no doubt by the Dunlop D207s, which gave good
grip and feedback. The brakes are more than adequate for the performance
of the bike, although they lacked the bite and feel of a sportsbike.
But as the CS had only done 1,200 miles, the pads and discs may
not have fully bedded-in. The test bike had the £345 ABS option
fitted, which I didn’t get the chance to use, but it didn’t
interfere with normal braking and it was nice to know it was there
if needed.
The riding position is relaxed,
with little body weight being taken through the arms, and the wide
bars give good control, especially at low speed through traffic.
The generously padded wide seat gave good support, and even after
2 hours in the saddle there were no twinges or aches.The small fairing
does a surprisingly good job of deflecting the air over rider, and
even with the speedo showing 110mph there was little upper body
pressure from the airflow. But like all unfaired bikes, you do get
the usual buffeting from other vehicles when following at speed.
The mirrors were good and solid up to around 70-75 mph, and then
got a little blurred but still quite readable. However, on the test
bike the right hand mirror head folded back at 95 mph and the pivot
couldn’t be tightened to stop this happening.
Conclusion
In spite of its somewhat unusual
looks, BMW have come up with an excellent bike in the 650CS. This
is a machine that can be a good first bike for the new rider, as
it can be both forgiving when things go wrong and rewarding when
you get things right; and the more experienced rider will also enjoy
the handling and performance without having to think too much about
their licence. And if that’s not enough, this is a bike that
can commute, tour, and blast the back roads on a warm summer day.
With BMW now building the bike in-house instead of farming out production
to the Italians, the quality control problems that occurred with
some of the earlier 650s should be a thing of the past. Which in
turn means that this could be a bike that could be ridden all year
round. But only time will tell.
|